Value-based stakeholder loyalty toward sport technology. A case of the electronic body protector and scoring system in taekwondo events. [Lealtad de los stakeholders hacia la tecnología deportiva basada en el valor percibido. El caso del protector pectoral electrónico y del sistema de puntuación en eventos de taekwondo].

Yong Jae Ko, Yonghwan Chang, Yong-Chae Rhee, Joseph S Valacich, Youngjin Hur, Chanmin Park


Only a few studies have examined issues related to sport stakeholders’ (e.g., athletes’, spectators’, and coaches’) perceived value of technology products and its influence on the purchase intention of sport technology. The model of value-based stakeholders’ loyalty toward sport technology (MVLST) is offered to inform customer purchase intentions of technology-based products by proposing theoretical relationships between perceived value, brand attitude, and purchase intention. The MVLST leverages core aspects of the technology acceptance model (TAM) and salient product attributes as quality, price, and innovativeness to develop the perceived value of sport technology (PVST). To test the theoretical relationships proposed in MVLST, a structural equation model was performed. Finally, multi-group SEM was employed to examine the moderating effect of consumer involvement. A total of 341 useful cases were collected from key stakeholders (e.g., spectators, coaches, and athletes) attending the 2010 US Open Taekwondo Championship; the technology-based product assessed by these survey participants was the electronic body protector and scoring system. The results of this analysis demonstrate that: (i) Usefulness, quality, and price are important value dimensions for attitude; (ii) conative loyalty (i.e., purchase intention) toward a sport technology occurs as consumers develop positive value perceptions and attitude toward the product; and (iii) the purchase intention of high vs. low involvement groups is dissimilarly influenced by the proposed value dimensions. From a theoretical perspective, the current study sheds light on the importance of attitude as a mediating variable and involvement as a moderating variable.


Hasta el momento, solo unos pocos estudios han examinado temas relacionados con el valor percibido de stakeholders (ej. atletas, espectadores, y entrenadores) sobre productos tecnológicos y su influencia en las intenciones de compra de tecnología deportiva. El modelo de lealtad de los stakeholders basado en el valor percibido hacia la tecnología deportiva (MVLST) presentado, en aras de mejorar el conocimiento sobre la intención de compra de productos tecnológicos en deporte, proponiendo relaciones teóricas entre el valor percibido, la actitud hacia la marca y las intenciones de compra. Este modelo aprovecha aspectos centrales del modelo de aceptación de la tecnología (TAM), junto con la calidad, la innovación y el precio, para desarrollar el valor percibido de la tecnología deportiva (PVST). Para probar las relaciones teóricas propuestas en MVLST, se implementó un análisis a través de un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales. Finalmente, el análisis multi-grupo SEM fue para examinar el efecto moderador de la participación de consumidor. Un total de 341 casos útiles fueron recogidos de diferentes grupos de interés (ej. espectadores, entrenadores, atletas) que asistieron al US Open Taekwondo Championship en 2010. Los productos tecnológicos evaluados fueron el protector pectoral electrónico y el sistema de puntuación. Los resultados del análisis sugieren que: (i) la utilidad, la calidad, y el precio forman dimensiones de valor importantes para la actitud, (ii) la lealtad conativa, es decir, la intención de compra hacia productos deportivos tecnológicos ocurre en la medida en que los consumidores desarrollan percepciones de valor y actitudes positivas hacia el producto, y (iii) la intención de compra de los grupos de alta o baja participación está influenciada por las dimensiones de valor propuestas. Desde una perspectiva teórica, este estudio muestra la importancia de la actitud como variable mediadora y la participación como una variable moderadora.



Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30, 361–391.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50: 179-211.

Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and Operation of Attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27-58.

Bagozzi, R. P.; Baumgartner, H., & Yi, Y. (1992). State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: An application to coupon usage. Journal Consumer Research, 18, 505–518.

Baker, W. E. (1990). Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 589-625.

Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815-824.

Bauer, H.; Falk, T., & Hammerschmidt, M. (2006). eTransQual: A transaction process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping. Journal of Business Research, 59, 866-875.

Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. (1993). A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: Do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 111-123.

Brexendorf, O. T.; Mühlmeier, S.; Tomczak, T., & Eisend, M. (2010). The Impact of sales encounters on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1148-1155.

Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of marketing, 61, 68-84.

Burton, S.; Lichtenstein, D. R.; Netemeyer, R. G., & Garretson, J. A. (1998). A scale for measuring attitude toward private label products and an examination of its psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 293-306.

Capon, N.; Farley, J. U.; Hulbert, J., & Lehmann, D. R. (1992). Profiles of product innovators among large U.S. manufacturers. Management Science, 38, 157–169.

Chi, E. H. (2005). Introducing wearable force sensors in martial arts. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4(3), 47-53.

Chu, C., & Lu, H. (2007). Factors influencing online music purchase intention in Taiwan: An empirical study based on the value-intention framework. Internet Research, 17, 139-155.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.

Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 22, 982-1003.

Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111-1132.

Dodds, W. B.; Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307–319.

Fisher, T. (2009). ROI in social media: A look at the arguments. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 16, 189-195.

Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 77-90.

Holbrook, M. B. (2006). Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay. Journal of Business Research, 59, 714-725.

Ingenbleek, P. T. M.; Frambach, R. T., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (2010). The role of value-informed pricing in market-oriented product innovation management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 1032-1046.

Johnson, M.; Gustafsson, A.; Andreassen, T. W.; Lervik, L., & Cha, J. (2001). The evolution and future of national customer satisfaction index models. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 217-245.

Keller, L. K. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1-22.

Kendzierski, D., & Whitaker, D. J. (1997). The role of self-schema in linking intentions with behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 139-47.

Kim, H.; Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43, 111-126.

Ko, Y. J.; Cattani, K.; Chang, Y., & Hur, Y. (2011). Do spectators and competitors accept the use of scoring technology in Taekwondo competitions? International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 9, 238-253.

Lim, H., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2004). Consumers' perceptions of e-shopping characteristics: An expectancy-value approach. Journal of Services Marketing, 18, 500-513.

Netemeyer, R. G.; Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. London: SAGE Publications.

Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63, 33-44.

Parasuraman, A., & Grewal, D. (2000). The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: A research agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 168–74.

Parks, L., & Guay, R. P. (2009). Personality, values, and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 675-84.

Patterson, P. G., & Spreng, R. A. (1997). Modeling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business-to-business, services context: an empirical examination. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8, 414-434.

Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 442–452.

Priester, J. R.; Nayakankuppam, D.; Fleming, M. A., & Godek, J. (2004). The A²SC² model: The influence of attitudes and attitude strength on consideration and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 574-87.

Sánchez-Fernandez, R.,; Iniesta-Bonillo, M. A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2009). The conceptualisation and measurement of consumer value in services. International Journal of Market Research, 51, 93-113.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225-243.

Sheth, J. N.; Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159–170.

Smith, R. E., & Vogt, C. A. (1995). The effects of integrating advertising and negative word-of-mouth communications on message processing and response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 133-151.

Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Geyskens, I. (2006). How country characteristics affect the perceived value of web sites. Journal of Marketing, 70, 136-150.

Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77, 203-220.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342–365.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.

Yang, Z., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 799-822.

Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of the evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22.


Palabras clave/key words

taekwondo event; technology acceptance model; sport technology; scale development; evento de taekwondo; modelo de aceptación de la tecnología; tecnología deportiva; desarrollo de escalas.

Texto completo/Full Text:

PDF (English) PDF

------------------------ 0 -------------------------

RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte
Publisher: Ramón Cantó Alcaraz
ISSN:1885-3137 - Periodicidad Trimestral / Quarterly
Creative Commons License