Previous studies have pointed out the convenience of taking the characteristics of the skill to be learned and the intrinsic characteristics of the learners into account when designing practice tasks. Nevertheless, few studies have manipulated the amount of variable practice. The ability to adapt, as an inherent feature of biological systems, can be an adequate framework to explain and predict motor learning processes. This paper is based on adaption processes explained under the theory of allostasis and the general adaption syndrome and shares the background of the Dynamic Systems Theory, to propose the concept of practice load as a useful tool to quantify variability of practice in motor learning. From this standpoint, the conditions of variable practice are reviewed to be a stimulus in an adequate magnitude and direction to take the learner to a higher level of performance and hence to optimize motor learning.

Resumen

Muchos autores han recomendado la conveniencia de ajustar los niveles de práctica variable teniendo en cuenta las características de la tarea y la variabilidad intrínseca que muestra el aprendiz en la ejecución de la habilidad. Sin embargo, no son numerosos los trabajos que han manipulado varios niveles de cantidad de variabilidad al practicar. La capacidad de adaptación, como rasgo de los sistemas biológicos puede resultar un marco adecuado para afrontar esta cuestión. En este trabajo, apoyado en los procesos de adaptación explicados bajo las teorías de alostasis y el síndrome general de adaptación (GAS), y bajo presupuestos compartidos por la Teoría General de Sistemas Dinámicos, propondrá el concepto de carga de práctica como una herramienta para cuantificar la práctica en el aprendizaje motor. Bajo esta perspectiva se revisan las condiciones en las que la práctica en variabilidad debe modularse, para suponer una estimulación que facilite al aprendiz una adaptación a un nivel de rendimiento superior y con ello optimizar el aprendizaje motor.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2015.03905

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References/referencias

Amato, I. (1992) Chaos breaks out at NIH, but order may come of it. Science, 257, 1763-1764.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1615321

Braun, D.A.; Aertsen, A.; Wolpert, D.M., & Mehring, C. (2009). Motor task variation induces structural learning. Current Biology. 19(4), 352-357.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.036

Breslin, G.; Hodges, N.J.; Steenson, A., & Williams, A.M. (2012). Constant or variable practice: Recreating the especial skill effect. Acta Psychologica. 140(2), 154-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.002

Button, C.; Seifert, L.; O'Donovan, D., & Davids, K. (2014). Variability in Neurobiological Systems and Training. In K. Davids, R. Hristovski, D. Araújo, N Balague Serre, C. Button, P. Passos (Eds). Complex Systems in Sport. (pp. 277-292). New York. Routledge.

Caballero, C.; Luis, V., & Sabido, R. (2012). [Efecto de diferentes estrategias de aprendizaje sobre el rendimiento y la cinemática en el lanzamiento del armado clásico en balonmano] The effect of different learning strategies on kinematics and performance of overhead handball throwing. European Journal of Human Movement, 28, 1-21.

Cannon, W.B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. New York: W. W. Norton.

Chrousos, G.P. (2009). Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 5(7), 374-381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2009.106

Cusumano, J.P.; Cesari, P. (2006). Body-goal variability mapping in an aiming task. Biological Cybernetics. 94(5), 367-379.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0052-1

Davids, K.; Brymer, E.; Seifert, L., & Orth D. (2014). Skill Acquisition and Representative Task Design. In K. Davids, R. Hristovski, D. Araújo, N Balague Serre, C. Button, P. Passos (Eds) Complex Systems in Sport. (pp. 319-333). New York. Routledge.

Davids, K.; Button, C.; & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints-led Approach. Champaign, Illinois. Human Kinetics.

Davids, K.; Glazier, P.; Araujo, D., & Bartlet, R. (2003) Movement systems as dynamical systems: the role of functional variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sports Medicine, 33, 245–60
http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333040-00001

Diedrichsen, J.; White, O.; Newman, D., & Lally, N. (2010). Use-dependent and errorbased learning of motor behaviors. Journal Neuroscience, 30(15), 5159-66
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5406-09.2010

Dilani Mendis, M.; Hides, J.A.; Wilson, S.J.; Grimaldi, A.; Belavý, D.L.; Stanton, W.; Felsenberg, D.; Rittweger, J., & Richardson, C.. (2009). Effect of prolonged bed rest on the anterior hip muscles. Gait & Posture. 30, 533-537.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.002

Edwards, C.A.L., & Hodges, N.J. (2012). Acquiring a novel coordination movement with non-task goal related variability. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 5 (1-M7), 59-67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1875399X01205010059

Elferink‐Gemser, M.T.; Visscher, C.; van Duijn, M.A.J., & Lemmink, K.A.P.M. (2006). Development of the interval endurance capacity in elite and sub-elite youth field hockey players. British Journal of Sport Medicine, 40, 340-345.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.023044

Frank, T.D.; Michelbrink, M.; Beckmann, H., & Schollhorn, W.I. (2008). A quantitative dynamical systems approach to differential learning: Self-organization principle and order parameter equations. Biological Cybernetics, 98(1), 19-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0193-x

Garcia J.A.; Moreno F.J.; Reina R.; Menayo R., & Fuentes J.P. (2008). Analysis of effects of distribution of practice in learning and retention of a continuous and a discrete skill presented on a computer. Perceptual and motor skills. 107, 261-272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.107.1.261-272

Ganzel, B.L.; Morris, P.A., & Wethington, E. (2010). Allostasis and the human brain: Integrating models of stress from the social and life sciences. Psychological Review, 117(1), 134–174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017773

Garhammer, J. (1979). Performance evaluation of Olympic weightlifters. Medicine and Science in Sports, 11 (3), 284-287.

Gingl, Z.; Kiss, L.B., & Moss, F. (1995). Non-dynamical stochastic resonance: Theory and experiments with white and arbitrarily coloured noise. Europhysics Letters, 29, 191–196.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/29/3/001

Hernández-Davo, H.; Urbán, T.; Morón, H.; Reina, R., & Moreno, F.J (2014). Variable training effect in the accuracy of the free throw in basketball in young players. Kronos, 13 (1) http://hdl.handle.net/11268/3531

Hernández-Davo, H.; Urbán, T.; Sarabia, J.M.; Juan-Recio, C., & Moreno, F.J (2014). Variable training: effects on velocity and accuracy in the tennis serve. Journal of Sport Sciences, 34 (14) 1383-1388.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.891290

Hoffman, J. (2012). NSCA's Guide to Program Design. Human Kinetics. Illinois

Hughes, V.A.; Frontera, W.R.; Roubenoff, R.; Evans, W.J., & Singh, M.A.F. (2002) Longitudinal changes in body composition in older men and women: role of body weight change and physical activity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76: 473-481.

Kelso, J.A.S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. International Press. 

LaCaille, R. A.; Masters, K. S., & Heath, E. M. (2004). Effects of cognitive strategy and exercise setting on running performance, perceived exertion, affect, and satisfaction. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5, 461-476.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(03)00039-6

Latash, M.L.; Scholz, J.P., & Schöner, G. (2002). Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 30(1), 26-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003677-200201000-00006

Lee, T. D.; Magill, R. A., & Weeks, D. J. (1985). Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 283–299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1985.10735350

Liu, Y. T.; Mayer-Kress, G.&. Newell, K. M. (2006). Qualitative and Quantitative in the Dynamics of Motor Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance, 32, 380-393.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.380

McEwen B.S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840. 33–44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x

McEwen, B.S. (2000). The neurobiologiy of stress: from serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Research, 886. 172-189.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02950-4

McEwen, B. S. (2002). The end of stress as we know it. Washington, DC. Joseph Henry Press.

McEwen B.S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews, 87, 873–901.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00041.2006

McEwen, B.S., & Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153, 2093–2101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1993.00410180039004

Menayo, R.; Moreno, F.J.; Fuentes, J.P.; Reina, R., & Damas, J. (2012). Relationship between motor variability, accuracy, and ball speed in the tennis serve. Journal of Human Kinetics, 33(1), 45–53.

Moreno, F.J., & Ordo-o, E.M. (2009). [Aprendizaje Motor y síndrome general de adaptación] Motor Learning and General Adaptation Syndrome. European Journal of Human Movement, 22, 1-21.

Moreno, F.J.; Peláez, M.; Urbán, T., & Reina, R. (2011). Different levels of variability versus specificity of practice applied to increase the performance under statics task constraints. 16th Annual European Congress of Sport Sciences Liverpool.

Moreno, F. J.; Avila, F.; Damas, J.; Garcia, J.A.; Luis, V.; Reina, R., & Ruiz, A. (2003). Contextual interference in learning precision skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 97, 121-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.121

Moss, F.; Ward, L.M., & Sannita, W.G. (2004). Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115 (2), 267–281.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.09.014

Newell, K.M.; Liu, Y., & Mayer-Kress, G. (2001). Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychological Review, 108, 57-82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.57

Newell K.M., & Corcos D.M. (1993) Issues in Variability and Motor Control. In K.M. Newell, D.M. Corcos (Eds) Variability and motor control. (pp. 1-12). Champaign. Human Kinetics

M Piacentini, M.; Meeusen, R.; Buyse, L.; De Schutter, G., & De Meirleir, K. (2004) Hormonal responses during prolonged exercise are influenced by a selective DA/NA reuptake inhibitor. British Journal of Sport Medicine, 38(2), 129-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2002.000760

Rabinovich. M.I., & Abarbanel, H.D.I. (1998). The role of chaos in neural systems. Neuroscience, 87, 5–14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00091-8

Ranganathan, R., & Newell, K.M. (2010). Motor learning through induced variability at the task goal and execution redundancy levels. Journal of motor behavior, 42(5), 307-316.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2010.510542

Ranganathan, R., & Newell, K.M. (2013). Changing Up the Routine: Intervention-Induced Variability in Motor Learning. Exercise Sport Sciences Review. 41, 64-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e318259beb5

Reynoso, S.R.; Sabido, R.; Reina, R., & Moreno, F.J. (2013). [Aprendizaje diferencial aplicado al saque de voleibol en deportistas noveles] Differential Learning Applied to Volleyball Serves in Novice Athletes. Apunts,114, 23-30.

Riley, M.A., & Turvey, M.T. (2002). Variability and determinism in motor behaviour. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 99-125.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222890209601934

Savelsbergh, G.; Kamper, W.J;, Rabius, J.; De Koning, J.J., & Schöllhorn, W. (2010). A new method to learn to start in speed skating: A differential learning approach. International Journal Sport Psychology, 41, 415-427.

Schmidt, R.A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4), 225-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076770

Schmidt, R.A., & Lee, T. (2005). Motor Control and Learning. A behavioural emphasis. Illinois. Human Kinetics.

Schöllhorn, W.; Beckmann, H., & Davids, K. (2010). Exploiting system fluctuations. Differential training in physical prevention and rehabilitation programs for health and exercise. Medicina, 46, 365-73.

Schöllhorn, W.; Beckmann, H.; Janssen,D., & Drepper,J. (2010). Stochastic perturbations in athletic field events enhance skill acquisition. In: I. Renshaw, K. Davids,K. G.J.P. Savelsbergh. Motor learning in practice – A constraints-led approach. (pp. 69-82). London. Routledge.

Scholz, J.P., & Schöner, G. (1999). The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 289-306.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002210050738

Seifert, L.; Button, C., & Davids, K. (2013). Key properties of expert movement systems in sport: an ecological dynamics perspective. Sports Medicine. 43(3), 167-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-012-0011-z

Selye H. (1956). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Shapiro, D.C., & Schmidt, R.A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence an developmental implications. In J.A.S. Kelso & J.E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and coordination. (pp. 113-159). New York. Wiley.

Shea, C.H.; Lai, Q.; Wright, D.L.; Immink, M., & Black, C. (2001). Consistent and variable practice conditions: Effects on relative and absolute timing. Journal motor Behavior. 33(2), 139-152.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222890109603146

Sterling, P. (2004). Principles of allostasis: Optimal design, predictive regulation, pathophysiology, and rational therapeutics. In: J. Schulkin, (Ed). Allostasis, homeostasis, and the costs of physiological adaptation. (pp. 17–64). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Sterling, P., & Eyer, J. (1988). Allostasis: A new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. In: Fisher S, Reason J, (Eds). Handbook of life stress, cognition, and health. (pp. 629–649). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Tremblay, L.; Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2001). Specificity versus variability: effects of practice conditions on the use of afferent information for manual aiming. Motor Control, 5(4), 347.

Van Rossum, J.H.A. (1990). Schmidt's schema theory: the empirical base of the variability of practice theory. Human Movement Science, 9, 387-435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90010-B

Williams, A. M., & Ward, P. (2003) Perceptual expertise in sport: Development. In A. Ericsson & J. Starkes (Eds.), Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 220–249). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Yamanashi, T.; Kawato, M., & Suzuki, R. (1980). Two coupled oscillators as a model for the coordinated finger tapping by both hands. Biological Cibernetics. 37, 219-225.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00337040

Zanone, P.G., & Kelso, J.A.S. (1992). The evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: Nonequilibrium phase transitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 403-421.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.403

adaptation; allostasis; training; quantification; variablilidad; alostasis; aprendizaje; cuantificación.